As I start to grow the Road Sign Collection. One of the first
things that has started to become apparent is that there are different types of
opposing sign categories within the sign collection.
Temporary / Permanent
Image / Text
/ Image and Text
Black and White
/ Colour
Triangle /
Circle / Square / Rectangle
As I move forward,
I feel that I need to decide on which category I am most engaged with and want
to develop further. It is the contrasting temporary / permanent which draws me
in the most, as within my art practice I usually work with the temporary.
I am partly interested
in temporary art as my practice is very much concerned with creating work which
exists for a limited time (Owens, 1998). This also allows me to explore the absence
of the art once it has been uninstalled (Doherty, 2015). I feel that there is a
real-life parallel with temporary road signs once they are removed from the site.
Once removed, is the feeling of absence felt here too? Due to this they also
carry a feeling of now-ness (Hayward, 2004). They are in this site right now,
for a very time specific reason. Due to the context of the sign and the context
the site, the sign would no longer make sense if it existed longer than
necessary.
The
permanent signs lose these characteristics, as the intention of them is to stay
in place and due to this they start to become less interesting to me. However, I
also have an interest in the everyday and placing attention onto thing which
are usually overlooked. The permanent signs are less obvious than the temporary
ones and so this brings me back to them. There is also more variety in the
signs which fall into the permanent category, possibly giving more scope for
development.
I am also intrigued
by, as mentioned in my
previous blog, in the notion of multiples as originals (Judovitz, 1998) and
this is something that I am more able to explore with the permanent signs.
With both sign
categories there is a direct relationship between themselves and their context,
the site of the signs gives the reader immediate access to them (Stiles and
Selz, 2012, p.712) as all road signs draw on our shared public language
(Wittgenstein in Kripke, 1984). The use of context helps the audience to
understand the text, in a real-life situation this is particularly important with
road signs as they are commenting on social contracts that we follow (Rousseau,
1998).
While I am
still unable to decide which category to peruse, I know that I want to challenge
this aspect of the signs by putting them into new sites. This will allow the
text to have a dialogical relationship with new sites (Owens, 1998).
The other categories
are less important in that I do not have control over them, in that I am taking
them as I find them.
References
Doherty, C.
(2015) Public Art (Now): Out of Time, Out
of Place. London: ART/BOOKS.
Hayward, K.
(2004) City Limits: Crime, Consumer
Culture and the Urban Experience. Routledge-Cavendish
Judovitz,
D. (1998) Unpacking Duchamp: Art in
Transit. University of California Press
Kripke, S. (1984) Wittgenstein Rules and Private Language. John Wiley & Sons; New
Ed edition.
Owens, C.
(1998) The Allegorical Impulse: Towards a
Theory of Postmodernism. New York: Oxford Press.
Rousseau, J. J.
(1998) The Social Contract.
Wordsworth Editions.